lunes, 18 de febrero de 2013

133JC - bednur-belenus



SRI

NRSIMHADEVA

MULTIPLY


juancas

SRI NRSIMHADEVA - MULTIPLY

Creado por juancas  del 18 de Enero del 2013


133JC - bednur-belenus
Jul 1, '07 8:46 AM
para Todos


BEDNUR ó BEDNORE. Geog. Ciudad de la India inglesa, en la región NO. del Maisur, sit. en la falda de los Gates Occidentales y rodeada por extensos bosques de espléndida vegetación. Contaba con más de 100.000 habits. cuando fue saqueada por Haider Alí. En 1783 Tippo Saib asaltó la ciudad, acuchillando a la guarnición inglesa.

1671-96 Rani Regnant Chennamma of Keladi (or Bednur) (India)
Also known as Chennammaji, she succeeded her husband Somashekara Nayak I at a very young age but managed to take over the throne in spite of scheming councillors and external dangers. Apparently she was skilled with the sword as well. Several ministers and the commander-in-chief unsuccessfully plotted to remove her from power. A member of the royal family who felt he should have succeeded to the crown made alliance with the Wodeyer ruler of Mysore, but the she defeated him in battle and forced a treaty on Mysore. Taking advantage of the situation the chieftains of Sodi, Sirsi and Vanavasi declared war but they too were crushed. Other leaders in the kingdom also revolted but she banished them. Rajaram, son of Chatrapati Shivaji came to her while fleeing from Aurangazeb and she granted him safe passage. This led to war with the Mughal Empire in which her troops destroyed a major part of the Mughal army led by Aurangazeb's son, they captured several Mughal captains and ultimately a treaty was signed. She was succeeded by adopted son, Asavappa Nayakka I.

1671-96 Rani Chennamma reinante de Keladi (o Bednur) (India)

También conocido como Chennammaji, ella tuvo éxito a su marido Somashekara Nayak que a una edad muy temprana pero logró apoderarse del trono a pesar de los concejales de intrigas y peligros externos. Al parecer ella era hábil con la espada también. Varios ministros y el comandante en jefe sin éxito planearon para que se le retire del poder. Un miembro de la familia real que sentía él debe han logrado a la Alianza de la corona hecha con la regla de Wodeyer de Mysore, pero el había derrotado en la batalla y forzó un Tratado sobre Mysore. Aprovechando la situación de los caciques de Sodi, Sirsi y Vanavasi declararon la guerra, pero ellos también fueron aplastadas. Otros líderes en el Reino también se sublevaron, pero ella les había desterrado. Rajaram, hijo de Chatrapati Shivaji vino a ella mientras huía de Aurangazeb y ella le otorgó salvoconducto. Esto condujo a la guerra con el Imperio Mogol, en que sus tropas destruyeron gran parte del ejército de Mughal, dirigido por el hijo de Aurangazeb, capturaron a varios capitanes de Mughal y finalmente se firmó un tratado. Ella fue sucedida por el hijo adoptivo, Asavappa Nayakka yo. (http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/womeninpower/Womeninpower1670.htm)
http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/womeninpower/Womeninpower2000.htm 




Cubierta delantera

Haidar Alʹi and Tipʹu Sultʹan, and the Struggle with the Musalmʹan Powers of ...

Escrito por Lewin Bentham Bowring

Short Notes on the Revolt of Dhundia in Bednur (1799-1800)

 The conquest of Mysore after the collapse of Seringapatam in 1799 did not settle the problem of pacifying the country. The English were confronted by many over-ambitious chief, military strategists and native leaders of different communities. As Wilks remarked, the like the great revolts of Pyche Raja of Malabar the revolt of Dhundia of Bednur shook the very basis of the English Company in that part of British India.
Dhundia Wagh, a Maratha adventurer, had incurred the displeasure of Tipu Sultan for his military penetrations into his boundary. The moment he was captured, Tipu converted him to Islam and entrusted him with a military assignment. But he failed to impress Tipu that he was put in jail in 1799. The fall of Tipu brought his release, upon which he organised force at Bednur, consisting of the anti-British factions.
Very soon he became a formidable force to be reckoned with and he began to extract heavy and forced contribu­tions. He carved out a small territory for himself. Having sensed the danger of Dhundia the British forces captured some of the forts he had forcibly taken. According to Thornton he was defeated at Shikarpur on the 17th August 1799, by the British forces but he escaped to Maratha country leaving his possessions.
For sometime Dhundia remained harmless, but all the while he was making his acquaintance with the affected chiefs of the Company's territories he instigated the disappointed princes to fight the English and he himself took the leadership. A political and military confederacy was soon established and he made several attacks on the Mysore boundary. The gravity of the situation made the English to send their famous General, Col, and Wellesley to meet all eventualities. This master strategist surrounded the forces of Dhundia from all sides.
Though Dhundia fought bravely the well-organised army of Wellesly caught him in a trap. The enormous number of British force seemed unconquerable Dhundi. However he escaped to the territories of the Nizam where he again fell a victim to the trap of the English. He lost everything and on the 10th September 1800 Wellesley made his well-concerted attack on the rebel.
The whole of the forces of Dhundia lay scattered and many of them were killed. Dhundia himself was killed in the fighting. Though Dhundia failed he proved himself a venerated leader of the masses enjoying considerable backing and popularity and he resisted the introduction of British rule with all his might in his own small way. The magnitude of his resistance could be well- understood from the great anxiety with which the British formulated their policy against him. It was left to Col. Wellesley to grapple with the situation.
 ***
La conquista de Mysore después del derrumbamiento de Seringapatam en 1799 no acabaron con el problema de pacificar el país. Los ingleses fueron confrontados por muchos jefe realista, estrategas militares y líderes indígenas de diferentes comunidades. Como Wilks, como las grandes rebeliones de Pyche Raja de Malabar la rebelión de Dhundia de Bednur sacudió la base misma de la empresa inglés en esa parte de la India británica.

Dhundia Wagh, un aventurero de Maratha, había incurrido en el desagrado del Tipu sultán sus penetraciones militar en su frontera. El momento que fue capturado, Tipu le convirtió al Islam y le confió una misión militar. Pero él no pudo impresionar Tipu que él fue puesto en prisión en 1799. La caída de Tipu trajo su liberación, que organizó la fuerza en Bednur, que consiste en las facciones antibritánicos.

Muy pronto se convirtió en una formidable fuerza a tener en cuenta y comenzó a extraer contribu­tions pesados y forzados. Consiguió crear un pequeño territorio para sí mismo. Después de haber detectado el peligro de Dhundia las fuerzas británicas capturaron algunas de las fortalezas que había tomado por la fuerza. Según Thornton fue derrotado en Shikarpur en 17 de agosto de 1799, por las fuerzas británicas, pero escapó a país de Maratha dejando sus posesiones.

Para Dhundia en algún momento seguía siendo inofensivo, pero a la vez que hacía su conocido con los jefes afectados de territorios de la compañía él instigó los príncipes decepcionados para luchar contra a los ingleses y él mismo tomó el liderazgo. Pronto se estableció una Confederación política y militar e hizo varios ataques en el límite de Mysore. La gravedad de la situación hizo el inglés para enviar su famosa General, Col y Wellesley para satisfacer todas las eventualidades. Este estratega principal había rodeado de las fuerzas de Dhundia de todos los lados.

Aunque Dhundia luchó valientemente el bien organizado ejército de Wellesly le había atrapado en una trampa. La gran cantidad de fuerza británica parecía invencible Dhundi. Sin embargo, escapó a los territorios de la Nizam donde cayó otra vez una víctima a la trampa de los ingleses. Perdió todo y el 10 de septiembre de 1800 Wellesley hizo su well-concerted ataque a los rebeldes.

El conjunto de las fuerzas de Dhundia pone disperso y muchos de ellos fueron asesinados. Dhundia mismo murió en los combates. Aunque Dhundia no se probó un venerado líder de las masas goza de considerable apoyo y popularidad y se resistió a la introducción de la regla británica con todas sus fuerzas a su pequeña manera. La magnitud de su resistencia podría ser bien-entendido de la gran ansiedad con que los británicos formulan su política contra él. Se dejó a Col. Wellesley a lidiar con la situación.
 (http://www.preservearticles.com/2011102015842/short-notes-on-the-revolt-of-dhundia-in-bednur-1799-1800.html)

The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland Publication Info

Coverage: 1835-1990 (Vol. 2 - New Series, No. 2)
Note: The content for Vol. 1 (1834) will be released as soon as the issues become available to JSTOR.

Cubierta delantera

History of Tipu Sultan

 Escrito por Mohibbul Hasan

BEHADUR ó BEHADER CHAH. Biog. Emperador mogol de la India, hijo y sucesor de Aureng Zeb, al que sucedió en 1707; vio empezar la decadencia del Imperio, no obstante haber alcanzado señaladas victorias en distintas ocasiones, pero tuvo que luchar contra sus hermanos rebeldes, contra los máratas, los príncipes radjputanos y los Sikes. N. en 1.642 m. en Lahores (1712) después de un reinado de cinco años, repartiéndose el Imperio sus cuatro hijos.

External links

All links retrieved December 7, 2012.
Bahadur Shah II - español
Bahadur Shah II - ingles
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Bahadur_Shah_II - ingles
http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/48921/Bahadur-Shah-II - inglés
http://www.indianetzone.com/6/bahadur_shah_ii.htm - inglés


en.wikipedia.org
Bahadur Shah II
230 × 358 - 55 k - jpg

en.wikipedia.org
Capture of Bahadur Shah Zafar and his sons by William Hodson at Humayun's ...
300 × 231 - 16 k - jpg

forum.urduworld.com
also known as Bahadur Shah or Bahadur Shah II (Urdu: ?
500 × 500 - 245 k - jpg

iloveindia.com
Bahadur Shah Zafar The last Mughal emperor of India, Bahadur Shah Zafar II ...
200 × 160 - 12 k - jpg

indiasite.com
Bahadur Shah ¤ The Decline of Mughal Dynasty
220 × 250 - 11 k - jpg

exoticindia.es
Bahadur Shah Zafar
613 × 750 - 199 k - jpg

royalark.net
... H.M. Abu'l-Muzaffar Siraj ud-din Muhammad Bahadur Shah II Padshah Ghazi, ...
250 × 410 - 83 k - jpg

forum.urduworld.com
Re: Bahadur Shah II- Bahadur Shah Zafar-Last Mughal Emperor – 04-21-2010 ...
500 × 709 - 47 k - jpg

asianart.com
The Emperor Bahadur Shah II Enthroned India, Delhi, Mughal, dated 1838 (A.H. ...
600 × 503 - 141 k - jpg

bilistorias.blogspot.com
... que han arrastrado consigo al mismísimo Bahadur Shah II, ...
795 × 600 - 219 k - jpg

es.123rf.com
Bahadur Shah II grabado antiguo retrato, Emperador de la India.
343 × 400 - 57 k - jpg

en.wikipedia.org
File:Bahadur Shah II - aka Zafar - Project Gutenberg eText 17711.jpg
636 × 897 - 64 k - jpg

top-topics.thefullwiki...
Bahadur Shah II top topics · Timeline of Indian history top topics
180 × 130 - 51 k - png

royalcollection.org.uk
Crown of the Emperor Bahadur Shah II
1789 × 2000 - 887 k - jpg

madmonarchist.blogspot...
Bahadur Shah II has the distinction of being the last emperor of the Mughal ...
370 × 269 - 31 k - jpg

123rf.com
Procession of the Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah II at Delhi, exiled to Rangoon ...
1200 × 849 - 269 k - jpg

dailynotes4upsc.blogsp...
Bahadur Shah Zafar last emperor of Mughal Empire son of Akbar Shah II
174 × 290 - 15 k - jpg

hasonraja.org
Queen Victoria, the Empress of India & Bahadur Shah II the last Mughal ...
676 × 300 - 248 k - jpg

scoop.it
Bahadur Shah II, popularly known as Bahadur Shah Zafar, was the last Mughal ...
250 × 250 - 20 k

pd.cpim.org
Bahadur Shah Zafar And The 1857 Revolt. Akbar Shah (Akbar II). Amar Farooqui
216 × 344 - 75 k - gif


BEHMAN. Mit. Dios inferior o genio persa que ejerce su acción protectora sobre los ganados y el laboreo del campo, sobre todo en el onceno mes solar, que lleva su nombre. Cuida especialmente de aplacar la cólera, y le esta consagrado el segundo día de cada mes. Los agricultores celebraban en su honor grandes fiestas en la época del año a él destinada. 

LOS 72 GENIOS de la KABBALAH






1 Vehuiah
2 Jeliel
3 Sitael
4 Elemiah
5 Mahasiah
6 Lelahel
7 Achaiah
8 Cahetel
9 Haziel
10 Aladiah
11 Lauviah
12 Hahaiah
13 iezalel
14 Mebael
15 Hariel
16 Hekamiah
17 Lauviah
18 Caliel
19 Leuviah
20 Pahaliah
21 Nelkhael
22 Yeiaiel
23 Melahel
24  Haheuiah
25 Nith-Haiah
26 Haaiah
27 Yerathel
28 Seheiah
29 Reiyel
30 Omael
31 Lecabel
32 Vasariah
33 Yehuiah
34 Lehahiah
35 Chavakiah
36 Menadel
37 Aniel
38 Haamiah
39 Rehael
40 ieiazel
41 Hahahel
42 Mikael
43 Veuliah
44 Ylahiah
45 Sealiah
46 Arial
47 Asaliah
48 Mihael
49 Vehuel
50 Daniel
51 Hahasiah
52 Imamiah
53 Nanael
54 Nithael
55 Mebahiah
56 Poyel
57 Nemamiah
58 Yeialel
59 Harahel
60 Mitzrael
61 Umabel
62 Iah-Hel
63 Anauel
64 Mehiel
65 Damabiah
66 Manakel
67 Eyael
68 Habuhiah
69 Rochel
70 Jabamiah
71 Haiayel
72 Mumiah
Oraciones a los 72 Genios de la Cabala
http://www.disciplinasastrales.com.ar/angeles/kabala/los72angeles.htm
http://eruizf.com/biblioteca/r_c/arnold_krumm_heller/arnold_krumm_heller_el_magico_poder_del_mantram.pdf


Cubierta delantera

Mitos persas

 Escrito por Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis
Cubierta delantera

Diccionario de mitología mundial

 Escrito por Rafael Fontán Barreiro

Cubierta delantera

Diccionario Akal de Términos Literarios

 Escrito por María V. Ayuso de Vicente,Consuelo García Gallarín,Sagrario Solano

BEHN. Biogr. 1470.

BEJUCO, LIANA. Para los poblaciones de raza tay el bejuco fue el vínculo primitivo entre el cielo y la tierra, ligamen cuya ruptura es de tradición universal.

La dualidad de la liana y el árbol alrededor del cual se enrolla es un símbolo del amor. Más precisamente en la India el bejuco es Parvati, y el árbol es Shiva en la forma del linga (falo). Este símbolo guarda analogía con el del betel. El enrollamiento helicoidal de las plantas volubles evoca además con toda naturalidad el simbolismo general de la espiral. (DICCIONARIO DE LOS SIMBOLOS, DE JEAN CHEVALIER).

BEL: Con su triunfal desalojo de la reina Belili, Bel se convirtió en el Señor Supremo del universo, padre del dios del Sol y del dios de la Luna, y pretendió ser el Creador, pretensión que alegó el advenedizo dios babilónico Marduk. Bel y Marduk fueron identificados finalmente, y como Marduk había sido un dios del Sol Primaveral y del trueno, Bel se convirtió igualmente en una especie de Zeus Solar antes de su emigración a Europa desde Fenicia. Parece que Beli era originalmente un dios del sauce, hijo adivinador de Belili, pero se convirtió en dios de la Luz. (La Diosa Blanca de R. Graves, 1º)

BELEÑO. Planta solanácea venenosa de hojas anchas y largas (que alcanza aproximadamente un metro de altura. Proporciona el alcaloide tóxico hiosciamina. Se usa en medicina como narcótico midriásico y analgésico. Es una planta peligrosa empleada en la antigüedad en la hechicería para producir distintos fenómenos.

BELENUS:

Name variants

Belanu, amongst the LiguriansBelanos
Belemnus
Belenos
Belenus
Belinos
Belinu
Belinus
Bellinus
Belus
Belyn in Welsh
Llywelyn, Belenus forms the root for the elyn in this compound Welsh name.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belenus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belenus
http://sgforums.com/forums/1366/topics/81736

https://www.lifeinthemix.info/2012/06/god-belenus/

The God Belenus: House of Judah take power in Britain

June 21, 2012
By



This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,–
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.
William Shakespeare, “King Richard II”, Act 2 scene 1

In the following thesis we investigate the origins of the shift from the Matriarchal system to that of the Patriarchal system, specific to its play in Britain and the tale of the patriarchs of the Old Testament linked as they are to the Egyptian pantheons of Hyksos-Egyptian pharonic dynasties as they made base on these shores.

If we are to understand how the battle between the twins of the House of Judah; Phrez and Zerah play out on the lands of Britain then we must shift to a time some 400BC and the arrival of the Belgae.[1]
The Belgae according to Robert Graves found within a reply to an Academic critique of his book, The White Goddess, has this to say :

That the Danaans are middle Bronze Age Pelasgians.” I did not use the uncritical term “middle Bronze Age” which he ascribes to me, but adopted the perfectly orthodox view that Pelasgians means Sea-People, and the perfectly orthodox identification of the Danuna, who belonged to the sea-federation that invaded Syria about the year 1200 BC, with the Aegean Danaans.[2]

Robert Graves so upset the world of Academia with his book The White Goddess, it has to be taken very seriously indeed. Out of the reach of many people on account of it being a hard read, due to the mass of information and diversity of mythos, requiring an esoterically trained mind and a hardened will to absorb and connect the copious amounts of languages as they changed over a long period of time. Time of course under the Patriarchal system we have today, is not a luxury the majority have, as they utilise all their energies to the acquirement of good old cash just to survive.

Missed by history on account of the fact the world of Academia having placed the kings pre-Roman invasion as mythical kings, but not without good reason when one considers their need for secrecy in order their long stayed secret work of the ages remains hidden until they have succeeded in entwining the world with the serpent of their making. We are at that time presently and as such we are also at the time of revelation.

In Robert Graves book The White Goddess he presents a timeline from which the lands known as the Great White Island, Albion, became the battleground leading to an empire of such immense size, that history had to deceive the future generations that Britain truly was the new Jerusalem heralding as her King the line to which the future Jesus would be born in the middle east, from the line of Phrez of the House of Judah.[3]

For such a shift to take place, not only did there have to be a change in racial ethnicity, the usual consequence of invasions, there had to be a shift in ‘alphabet’ leaving the old Matriarchal system language presented as a nature religion in its use of the trees, to that of the Patriarchs and that of the Torah (Old Testament) which the Belgae would bring with them to Cornwall centuries after the Trojan Brutus landed they claim in Devon. With that in mind it is no surprise that the Belgae would not so much invade, but more in tune with hopping over to yet another territory held by the House of Judah, Cornwall.

The Phoenician heritage of Cornwall is no secret, yet many claim Cornwall only to have been a point of trade for the Phoenicians and not presenting the reality, at least from 400BC, that Cornwall was a kingdom, and the point at which the story of England as the New Jerusalem would begin, and I ask you note, in direct contradiction to the current script put forward by those claiming to have the Templar knowledge with the claim, Joseph of Arimathea brought a child of Jesus to Glastonbury, it began way before Jesus.

In order we can follow the story correctly we need a good understanding of the meaning to the battle of the Trees, for that we turn again to Graves :



It seems then that Beli was originally a Willow-god, a divinatory son of Belili, but became the God of Light, and that in fourth-century B.C. Britain, at the Cad Goddeu, his power was invoked by his son Amathaon as a means of supplanting Bran of the alder, whose counterpart had perhaps been similarly supplanted in Palestine. At the same time Gwydion of the ash supplanted Arawn, another divinatory god whose tree is not known.[4]

The Battle of the Trees therfore was a point at which one pantheon of gods were supplanted by a new :

The powers of the gods were continually being redefined. The Greek god Apollo, for instance, seems to have begun as the demon of a mouse –fraternity[5] in pre-Aryan totemistic Europe; he gradually rose in divine rank by force of arms, blackmail and fraud, until he became the patron of music, poetry, and the arts, and finally in some regions at least, ousted his father, Zeus, from the serenity of the universe by identifying himself with Belenus the intellectual god of light.[6]

Apollo of course was the god to whom Troy was in patronage and given the Trojans claim, and it appears to ring true.. that they are of the tribe of Judah.[7]

In response to criticism of his book The White Goddess, Graves had this to say :

Beli, or Belenus, was an early British Sun god, as doctor Daniel will not have the temerity to deny.[8]

In discussion of an ancient tradition of Briton and the ‘Battle of the Trees’ ( The Cad Goddeu),[9] we learn that Bel worship was already present yet not perhaps looked upon in the same way as the Bel of Babylon, having morphed quite a few times before reaching even the Isles of Albion, Graves says :

The Cad Goddeu can perhaps be explained as the expulsion of a long established bronze age priesthood from the national Necropolis by an alliance of agricultural tribesman, long settled in Britain and worshippers of the Dannan god Bel Beli Belus or Belenus, with an invading Brythonic tribe.[10]

Further evidence of the fact, Bel in Old Briton should not be seen as the same deity as that worshipped in Babylon, comes in the following extract again, from the White Goddess :

The ultimate origin of the god Beli is uncertain, but if we identify the British Belin or Beli with Belus the father of Danaus (as Nennius does), then we can further identify his with Bel, the Babylonian Earth god, one of a male trinity, who succeeded to the tiles of a far more ancient Mesopotamian deity, the mother of Danae as opposed to the father of Danaus.

This was Belili, the Sumerian white goddess, Ishtar’s predecessor, who was a goddess of trees as well as a moon goddess, love goddess and underworld goddess. She was a sister and lover to Du’uzu, or Tammuz, the corn god and pomegranate god.

From her name derives the familiar biblical expression sons of ‘Belial’-the jews have characteristically altered the none Semitic name Belial into the Semitic Beliy wa’al (‘from which one comes not up again, ie the underworld)-meaning ‘Sons of Destruction’.

The Slavonic word Beli meaning white and the Latin Belus meaning beautiful are also ultimately connected with her name. originally every tree was hers, and the Goidelic bile, sacred tree,  the medieval Latin Billa and Billus, ‘branch, branch of tree’, and the English Billet are all recollections of her name. above all, she was a willow goddess and goddess of wells and springs.

The willow was of great importance in the worship of Jehovah at Jerusalem, and the great day of the Feast of Tabernaccles, a fire and water ceremony, was called the day of willows.

Though Elder and willow are not differentiated in Hebrew-they are of the same family-Tanaitic tradition, dating from before the destruction of the Temple, prescribed that the red twigged willow with lanceolate leaves, ie. The purple osier, should be the sort used in the thyrsus, quince and willow carried during the Feast; if none were attainable, then the round leaved willow, ie the sallow or ‘palm’, might be used, but the variety with toothed leaves, ie the elder, was forbidden-presumably because it was uses in idolatrous rites in honour of Astarte and her son the Fire god.[11]

What this means is that in order to implement the Patriarchal system, the roles had to shift, because under the matriarchal system the Queen is the representation of The White Goddess, as such she held the lands and chose her warrior husband who’s role was to protect those lands, this was the matriarchal system.

In order to shift to the Patriarchal system these roles had to be reversed as decreed by the Egyptian pantheons, morphed in Babylon to form the Torah. Thus in the battle of the Trees the Torah was victorious and replaced the old ways with that we exist within today.

To help you better understand what I have presented thus far, we look again at Robert Graves :

To summarise in a rough-and-ready fashion, the book’s argument is that in late prehistoric times, throughout Europe and the Middle East, matriarchal cultures, worshipping a supreme Goddess and recognising male gods only as her son, consort or sacrificial victim, were subordinated by aggressive proponents of patriarchy who deposed women from their positions of authority, elevated the Goddess’s male consorts into positions of divine supremacy and reconstructed myths and rituals to conceal what had taken place. This patriarchal conquest happened at various times, beginning in the second millennium BC and reaching Britain around 400 BC. True poetry (inspired by the Muse and her prime symbol, the moon) even today is a survival, or intuitive re-creation, of the ancient Goddess-worship. Moreover, her cult and the matriarchy that went with it represented a saner and happier mode of human existence than the patriarchy of the male God and his sun-inspired rationality, which have produced most of the ills of the modern world.[12]

Robert Graves has given insight through his inspired grasp on the ancient mythos as to the time when the chess game of the House of Judah would enter the British Isles, at least that is, as the theatre of its war. But like all such sagas there is more to the story which ties the god Jehovah to Britain as far back as the immediate post flood period.

Though it is not the aim to investigate beyond 400BC in this thesis, as it is clear to my mind that the history of the empire we have suffered well, takes off after the death of Dunvallo Molmutius, as such a study of its merits must be the order of the day because the 2012 Olympics are heralding the end of the great work.[13]

All Change

We now reach the point at which all things in Southern Britain would change according to Celtic and indeed Roman accounts of the land called Albion,

Dunvallo Molmutius (Welsh: Dyfnwal Moelmud) was a legendary king of the Britons as accounted by Geoffrey of Monmouth. He was the son of Cloten, the King of Cornwall, and he restored order after the “Civil War of the Five Kings”. He and his descendants were of a sub-branch of the genealogical line of Brutus, the dominant line having ended with Porrex I before the civil war.

Dunvallo was the King of Cornwall during the war created in the power vacuum left by Porrex I. He was braver and more courageous than all the other kings in the war. He defeated Pinner, the king of Loegria. In response, Rudaucus, king of Cambria, and Staterius, king of Albany, allied together and destroyed much of Dunvallo’s land. The two sides met in battle and were stalemated. Dunvallo then took 600 of his men and himself and dressed themselves in the armour of the dead enemies. They led a charge deep into enemy lines where they killed the two kings. After this battle, Dunvallo destroyed the remaining defenses of the kings and pillaged their lands.

Following the defeat of the rival kings, Dunvallo created a crown like that of his predecessors and claimed the throne of Britain. He created a set of rules for the kingdom called the Molmutine Laws which lasted for many centuries. Also, robbery throughout the kingdom nearly ended for fear of Dunvallo and his laws. He reigned in peace and prosperity for forty years then died and was buried in the Temple of Concord, a tribute to his laws, which resided in Trinovantum. His death sparked another civil war between his two sons, Belinus and Brennius.

In Dunvallo Molmutius we have the origins of British common law, known as the Molmutine Laws,[14] but the story really gets off the ground through his two feuding sons Belinus[14] and Brennius.[15]

We arrive at the point where the House of Judah through Dunvallo and his two sons Belinus and Brennius begin to formulate an empire so vast for its time, that such an influence from these two feuding brothers had not only and effect on these Isles, but in Norway, Denmark, Gaul, Rome, Germany, and Delphi, as such it is also the point at which the Patriarchal system set forth in Egypt through Babylon and on to the Middle East could be seen to be active in Britain.

Supremacy of the New Nobility (287–133 BC)

The great accomplishment of the Hortensian Law was in that it deprived the patricians of their last weapon over the plebeians. Thus, the last great political question of the earlier era had been resolved. As such, no important political changes would occur between 287 BC and 133 BC.[16] The critical laws of this era were still enacted by the senate.[17]In effect, the plebeians were satisfied with the possession of power, but did not care to use it. The senate was supreme during this era because the era was dominated by questions of foreign and military policy.[18] This was the most militarily active era of the Roman Republic.

The final decades of this era saw a worsening economic situation for many plebeians. The long military campaigns had forced citizens to leave their farms to fight, only to return to farms that had fallen into disrepair. The landed aristocracy began buying bankrupted farms at discounted prices. As commodity prices fell, many farmers could no longer operate their farms at a profit.[19]The result was the ultimate bankruptcy of countless farmers. Masses of unemployed plebeians soon began to flood into Rome, and thus into the ranks of the legislative assemblies. Their economic state usually led them to vote for the candidate who offered the most for them. A new culture of dependency was emerging, which would look to any populist leader for relief.[20]

It is clear in the above paragraph relating to the supremacy of the new nobility that hand in hand with them comes war and conquest, whereas pre 390 and the entrance of Brennius, Rome was not overly concerned in war save for the protection of the assembly of the tribes and their lands. This new nobility had slowly gained its power when the Senate did require their services in military matters as it would be the Plebians expected to fight, and as early as 494 BC, the city was at war with two neighbouring tribes. The plebeian soldiers refused to march against the enemy, and instead seceded to the Aventine Hill. The plebeians demanded the right to elect their own officials. The patricians agreed, and the plebeians returned to the battlefield.[21]

Undermining regimes via infiltration through marriage we know to have been a major strategy throughout history, to achieve their aim in this manner, they also had to position themselves amongst the ranks of the elite of the regime and did so as soldiers and men at arms, in the first instant, and usually for victories on behalf of the elite the same would generally be given lands by a grateful Senator or Nobleman. Taking into consideration the manner of Brennius and the fact he took Rome in 390BC, then the proceeding years leading up to the time 287BC some 97 years in total, would be ample time for Brennius to have implemented such a strategy leading ultimately to full takeover under the new Nobility of warlords.

Such a play would then beg the question; was Julius Caesar repositioning Rome away from he influence set forth by the Brennius nobility?

Did Cartimandua Queen of the Brigantes continue an agreement made by her predecessor said to be around 40AD with Rome that she to could ensure the Patriarchal system of Judah was not the power in the Brigantes?

Such a move would have ensured the power of the matriarch would have a place within the Patriarchal age through the church of Rome, renamed as the holy mother, or the White Goddess ensuring her influence into the Patriarchal age?

Below are two images, the Celtic Wheel and the Chi Rhio :



The next question would be…. why are the majority of Celtic peoples today Catholics?

Constantine was based in York, the place of the legions when he was named Augustus, or Caesar in waiting. Thus Constantine had to then make it so and off he went with a British army to take his seat at the throne of Rome.

Given Constantine’s time in Britain and the fact Cartimandua as the largest representative of the matriarchal system in Britain, then it is not without possibility that he and perhaps his mother synchronised with the White Goddess of Albion.

To further this we look at old king Coal. (Cole)[22]

Coel Hen appears in the Harleian genealogies and the later pedigrees known as the Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd (The Descent of the Men of the North) at the head of several post-Roman royal families of the Hen Ogledd.[i] His line, collectively called the Coeling, included such noted figures as Urien, king of Rheged; Gwallog, perhaps king of Elmet; the brothers Gwrgi and Peredur, and Clydno Eiddin, king of Eiddin or Edinburgh.[i][ii] He was also considered to be the father-in-law of Cunedda, founder of Gwynedd in North Wales, by his daughter Gwawl.[iii] The genealogies give him the epithet Godebog, meaning “Protector” or “Shelterer”.[i] The poem Y Gododdin mentions some enmity between the “Sons of Godebog” and the heroes who fought for the Gododdin at the Battle of Catraeth.[ii]

As an ancestor figure, Coel Hen compares to Dumnagual Hen, who is likewise attributed with founding kingly lines in the Hen Ogledd. According to Welsh tradition the region of Kyle was named for Coel, and a mound at Coylton in Argyll was regarded as his tomb.[iv] Projections back from dated individuals suggest that Coel Hen lived around AD 350–420, during the time of the Roman departure from Britain.[ii] In his widely criticised book[v] The Age of Arthur, historian John Morris suggested that Coel may have been the last of the Roman Duces Brittanniarum (Dukes of the Britons) who commanded the Roman army in northern Britain.[vi] According to Morris he may have taken over the northern capital at Eburacum (York) to rule over what had been the northern province of Roman Britain. Upon Coel Hen’s death, his lands would have been split between his sons, Garmonion and Cunedda II, and later his grandsons, Dunwal Moelmut, Cunedda III, and Gwrwst Ledlwn.

[i] Bromwich, pp. 256–257.
[ii] MacQuarrie, p. 5.
[iii] Koch, p. 458.
[iv] Bromwich, p. 314.
[v] N. J. Lacy, A history of Arthurian scholarship Arthurian studies, 65 (Boydell & Brewer Ltd, 2006), pp. 9–10.
[vi] Morris, p. 54

Given we understand that an alliance between the queen of the Brigantes Cartimandua and perhaps the Republican side of Rome, then through king Coal is more than lightly the British move against the rise of the Imperial Rome from Brennius which appeared to have been taken to heart by some Anglo-Saxon tribes in the South of England, a point that can be supported by the fact in Anglo-Saxon England would be born a mimic of Canon Law under Ethelbert when new codes of law were introduced from which the compensation culture would be birthed, specifically relating to the maiming of a person and the expected financial reparation expected by the family of the victim from the perpetrator. Included in the codes was instruction in compensation for loss of fingers, ears, and for damage to genital areas leaving the afflicted party unable to reproduce, then a fee of the worth of three persons was the figure to be paid in compensation, to compensate for three children that will not be born, the figure payable was dependant upon how much a life in those days was worth in hard currency and would accord to the rank of the injured party.

This move can be seen to be one of the first against the power of the clergy in dealing with all matters of business of the aristocracy, instead of going to the bishop for justice, they would make plea to those amongst their own ranks and a step to justice according to commerce and statutes over the creation set forth by god, and, we must consider the fact that from Anglo-Saxon law such provisions were only for the king down to the Freeman, the mass of people were slaves and so not included in the protection of Saxon Justice. In this sense the Saxon Law was for the elite to gain justice outside the morality set forth by the church, as such it was a law code for the elite and a clear separation between the elite, the people, and god.

The next phase of Saxon Law would create the Hundreds Courts and the Shire Courts leading to the Shire-Reve (Sheriff) and the emergence of the oath system, a system in its day expressing the uppermost power to ensure justice, because as a Christian nation it was understood that to break an oath, would lead to ones ultimate damnation, a powerful self regulating system indeed, while still allowing for Saxon codes and the clergy to operate together. The split can be seen in the withdrawal from power of Colchester to the Saxon Rochester.

Under Athelstan[23] the Saxon codes would shift the power of justice from Church to King, under Athelstan justice was beholden to the king and the commencement of the battle in Britain for absolute authority between Church and emperor kings. We can see the mind of Athelstan in the changes made to the idea of justice as punishment moved from financial compensation to mutilation, including decapitation with the head placed upon a stake and the chopping off of hands. The church pushed for the less violent code and in an attempt to position god as judge they administered what was termed ‘trial by ordeal’,[24] which from early records show a overwhelming majority of those undergoing the trail would be found to be innocent.

Saxon alliance with the Norman’s can be gleaned in the Norman lust for blood and their move against church doctrine coveting systems in contradiction to the teaching of Christ, and what appeared to be mass conversion of the Saxons to Christianity under Ethelbert, was to be scuppered by the 1066 invasion in readiness for the influx of the Carolingian Normans who in complete opposition to all doctrines of the New Testament, instilled the feudal system. In this sense we can see a clear demarcation between the church and the would be emporers, one gives authority to god, the others take it unto themselves. We see again the twin aspect of Judah playing out on these lands.

Back we go to Constantine and Helena, and what is clear is the fact Constantine did all he did with an army of willing Britons presenting the fact,  such a reality could only exist because the Britons had faith and alleigence to Constantine. For such a situation Constantine had to be known by the Brions to be of their blood and their heritage, this could only be so because they understood that in Helena, remained the representative of the White Goddess, as such Constantine was her heavenly warrior king on earth. As Brigantia manifest we must conclude that the Roman Church in its doctrine, and I stress, not the Curch in its wealth nor schemes of power and command…. that the Church herself is the representation of the matriarch, the White Goddess, a position that has ensured the matriarch had representation through the last two thousand years of patriarchial madness.

As such the Church of Rome is in fact the Church of Albion, Brigantia, the holy mother as nature herself, the keeper of heaven and the nurturer of gods creation.

So what does all this mean?

History reveals to us the fact Phoenicians had a stake in Cornwall some 3000 years BC in their hunt for Tin, Bristol being their main south western port. Britain is an Island, as such all foreign adventurers would always land at the coast. Naturally only those with the ability to navigate the seas would be in the position to set up trade centres within the limits of their vessels ability to traverse the oceans. The Phoenicians as history shows were just such a race.

Given we are speaking of the House of Judah then the Phoenicians must have had serious connections with Egypt as they would bring forth the Patriarchs depicted in the Old Testament which appear to be Egyptian Hyksos transformed into a new pantheon today known as the Twelve tribes of Israel. Like it or not, it would appear that few of us in the west should we trace our ancestry, will one way or another find they tie into these tribes. That being so, the battles between the twins of the House of Judah, being only one of the tribes of Israel, presents the reality that one tribe has managed to monopolise not only temporal power but spiritual power as overlords to the remaining tribes, One ring controls the others so to speak.

With this reality having been accomplished then both sides of the way to exist must again have representation in the new, and it appears the House of Judah was the chosen tribe in which the battle of light and dark would once again act its play, and from the twins of Darda, Phrez and Zerah we have just such a symbolic battle taking place in Brtian and Europe some 390 BC, with an empire so great that Britain and Europe would become the feifdom of one tribe while purposfully keeping the nations divided.

As for Britain and the commencement of an overt empire from these shores I find it interesting such a reality comes after the Battle of the Trees, which according to mythos was more a battle of alphabets, the consequence of which began the removal of the Matriarchal system to be replaced with the Patriarchal Egyptian system transformed in Babylon by the levite priests, or a shift from the spoken word to that of the written word, culminating in the penned Old Testament, the backdrop to the religion of the Male.

Though we can follow the House of Judah in Britain with some degree of accuracy, such realms as that under Queen Cartimandua in the Brigantes still remained under the matriarchal system, that is until a schism whereby Cartimandua divorced her warrior husband and married his man at arms with disastrous consequences for the realm and in parallel with the Arthur and Guinevere.[25]

Cartimandua handed over the rebel Caractacus to the Roman army, caractacus interconnected with thew saxons in the south of England, this suggests the battle between the old Roman republic and the new creed set fouth by Brennius shifted to Britain through the Saxons, ultimatley to the carolingian Normans, and can be seen in the seemingly odd behaviour of the Brigantian queen, given she was Brigantia in the flesh. Not so odd when one grasps the fact in Northern Britain the main influence would be that of Belenus. To consider the Danish influence in the bringing of Christianity back to Brigantia through Oswald, who’s enemies lay to the south, also further supports the Belenus influence in the northern territories continued through the Druids.

It can then be said that the original Roman Republic was founded in the influence of Peres, that the alliance with Brigantia was based in this fact and reason the Roman aristocracy sent their children to be eductaed in Briton. That from the battles between Belenus and Brennius was created the imperial mind with Brennius having base in an area of Switzerland, with absolute control on Rome and parts of Saxony. In that sense history from around 390 BC has been the stage for the battle between the dark twin and the twin of the light, one requires domination through force at arms be they of steel or of statute, and ultimately ascension through strength of wit to decieve, and of the arm in violence, the other offers ascension through nurtering all that is good within opening the gate to the heavens of the kingdom offered by Jesus while alive and kicking in the now, giving us the way of the west

Vatican II[26] however is something quite different indeed. No matter what intrigues surround the physical Church, the players, and the usurpers, what holds firm is the doctrine, the doctrine of how to achieve a way of life for a whole nation free’er from fear, enabling good relations and cohesion, and I cite the country in which I have grown Great Britain as  just such a place, then it must be understood this doctrine is under threat, and Vatican II is the key to this threat as it places the doctrine of the White Goddess, the Holy Mother right into the hands of the dark twin through its doctrines becoming subservient to that of the reformed Russian Orthodox Church, which since the 1917 Rothschild led, and so under the Committee of 300′s commandedd Russian Revolution, in which some 50 million Orthodox Christians were murdered, the revised doctrine is that of the Luciferian creed, as such is the gateway for the rule of the Anti-Christ doctrine and system as the one world religious morality.

I need not hold pretence I express something you do not know, you can feel the anti-christ doctrine in your pocket, see it in the ever more debauched tv scripts, aimed at children to sexualise, the twisted coprporate education methods being thrust upon our children in schools, as they destreoy our economies, our industry and commerce. We lost something down the road, what we lost was the morality of the White Goddess blinded as we are to the merits of a commercial morality, we are losing the difficult to upkeep self imposed morality in order we  enjoy a better way to exist, blinded by the intrigues of persons bereft of the doctrines so not of the doctrines, so we forget the doctrines and we get the world 2012, just before the Olympic extravaganza which is to symbolise the emergence overtly, of the Fourth Reich.

In Britain we do not have excuse to disperse the docines of the chiurch, for they are of this land whatever the title, Church of Rome or Church of England, they are one and the same, but from the original doctrines must they must take their authority, not from Vatican II nor from the Evangelical.

If how to be British we have forgoten, we need only remember we are Christian in morality, that is our church, it exists in our hearts, so why are we chasing our minds?

If we lose the Church of Rome as a doctrine to the Luciferian Russain Orthodax dooctrine, then the dark twin, the beast, will rule supreme for centuries to come, in giving up our heritage we lose our moral realm, our freedom, our soul, we become the world before Christ, we become sellable slaves, assets of the corporate machine, we will lose our humanity.

Notes

[1] “That the Begae invaded Britain in 400 BC, and that their God was the [Celto-Teutonic] Gwydion [alias Woden, or Odin] and that the ash [Ydgrasill] was sacred to him.” The first of these “fancies” is to be found in almost every modern text-book of British prehistory, though so late a date as 180 BC is sometimes postulated; the second has the weighty authority of Professor Sir John Rhys; the third, Dr. Daniel should have learned in the nursery. Robert Graves The White Goddess p.485

[2] Sir, – Dr. Glyn E. Daniel, reviewing my White Goddess and misled by its unpedantic style into thinking that I have taken no trouble to check my facts, lists “among the fancies so extravagant and improbable as to cease to be amusing” the following: (1) “That the Danaans are middle Bronze Age Pelasgians.”  I did not use the uncritical term “middle Bronze Age” which he ascribes to me, but adopted the perfectly orthodox view that Pelasgians means Sea-People, and the perfectly orthodox identification of the Danuna, who belonged to the sea-federation that invaded Syria about the year 1200 BC, with the Aegean Danaans. Since my book was in print Professor Garstang has published an account  in The Times of a newly discovered Danuna city in Asia Minor, with inscriptions in what is thought to be the Canaanitish language, and connects the Danuna (as I do) with Danaus, the eponymous tribal hero of the Danaans who came from Africa by way of Palestine and Rhodes long before the Trojan War.


[4] Robert Graves The White Goddess, page 54


[6] Robert Graves The White Goddess p.10

[7] Apollo shot arrows infected with the plague into the Greek encampment during the Trojan War in retribution for Agamemnon’s insult to Chryses, a priest of Apollo whose daughter Chryseis had been captured. He demanded her return, and the Achaeans complied, indirectly causing the anger of Achilles, which is the theme of the Iliad.

In the Iliad, when Diomedes injured Aeneas, Apollo rescued him. First, Aphrodite tried to rescue Aeneas but Diomedes injured her as well. Aeneas was then enveloped in a cloud by Apollo, who took him to Pergamos, a sacred spot in Troy.

Apollo aided Paris in the killing of Achilles by guiding the arrow of his bow into Achilles’ heel. One interpretation of his motive is that it was in revenge for Achilles’ sacrilege in murdering Troilus, the god’s own son by Hecuba, on the very altar of the god’s own temple.

[8] Robert Graves The White Goddess  p.485-6

[9] Cad Goddeu (English: The Battle of the Trees)[ii] is a medieval Welsh poem preserved in the 14th-century manuscript known as the Book of Taliesin. The poem refers to a traditional story in which the legendary enchanter Gwydion animates the trees of the forest to fight as his army. The poem is especially notable for its striking and enigmatic symbolism and the wide variety of interpretations this has occasioned.

[ii] For it has already been shown that the Battle of the Trees was fought between the White Goddess (‘the woman’) for whose love the god of the waxing year and of the waning year were rivals, and ‘the man’, Immortal Apollo, or Beli, who challenged her power. In other words, the sacred name IEVOA, or JIEVOAO its enlargement, revealed by Amathaon to Gwydion and used as a means of routing Bran, was the name of the Fivefold Goddess Danu. This was a name in which Bran could claim to speak oracularly from her kingdom of Dis, as one who had had intimate experience of each of her five persons—by being born to her, initiated by her, becoming her lover, being lulled to sleep by her, and finally killed by her. The new name of eight letters which replaced it was Beli-Apollo’s own, not shared with the White Goddess, and it was therefore conveniendy forgotten by later mythographers that the original one belonged to Bran, or Q’re, or Iahu, only by virtue of his birth, marriage and death under female auspices. Professor Sturtevant, expert on the Hittites, translates Q’re as Karimni which means merely ‘to the god’; but, as Mr. E. M. Parr points out, El is both the common word for ‘god’ in Syria and a proper name for the oak-god El. He holds that other forms of this same word are Horus, or Qouros, a god of the island of Thera—the Semitic form of Horus is Churu. The identity of Q’re is confused by the Gods Nergal and Marduk having also assumed the name (Qaru): Marduk’s Amorites called him Gish Qaru, ‘Q’re of trees and herbs’, to identify him with Nergal, the God of Tuesday on which trees and herbs were first created. Robert Graves The White Goddess p. 341

[10] Robert Graves The White Goddess  p51.

[11] Robert Graves The White Goddess P.54

[12] From the introduction to Robert Graves’ The White Goddess, page ix-x.



[14] Belenus

[15] Brennius

Supremacy of the new Nobility

[16] Abbott, 63

[17] Abbott, 65

[18] Abbott, 66

[19]Abbott, 77

[20] Abbott, 80

[21] Abbott, 28

[22] King Coal the name of a figure, prominent in British literature and legend. Early Welsh tradition knew of a Coel Hen (Coel the Old), a leader in Roman or Sub-Roman Britain and the progenitor of several kingly lines in the Hen Ogledd (“the Old North”), the Brythonic-speaking part of northern England and southern Scotland. From medieval sources told of a Coel,  derived from Coel Hen, who was the father of Saint Helena and the grandfather of Roman Emperor Constantine the Great.

[23] Edward’s heir Athelstan (reigned 925-39) was also a distinguished and audacious soldier who pushed the boundaries of the kingdom to their furthest extent yet. In 927-8, Athelstan took York from the Danes; he forced the submission of king Constantine of Scotland and of the northern kings; all five Welsh kings agreed to pay a huge annual tribute (reportedly including 25,000 oxen), and Athelstan eliminated opposition in Cornwall. 

The battle of Brunanburh in 937, in which Athelstan led a force drawn from Britain and defeated an invasion by the king of Scotland in alliance with the Welsh and Danes from Dublin, earned him recognition by lesser kings in Britain.

Athelstan’s law codes strengthened royal control over his large kingdom; currency was regulated to control silver’s weight and to penalise fraudsters. Buying and selling was mostly confined to the burhs, encouraging town life; areas of settlement in the midlands and Danish towns were consolidated into shires. Overseas, Athelstan built alliances by marrying four of his half-sisters to various rulers in western Europe. 

He also had extensive cultural and religious contacts; as an enthusiastic and discriminating collector of works of art and religious relics, he gave away much of his collection to his followers and to churches and bishops in order to retain their support. 

Athelstan died at the height of his power and was buried at Malmesbury; a church charter of 934 described him as ‘King of the English, elevated by the right hand of the Almighty … to the Throne of the whole Kingdom of Britain’. Athelstan died childless. Source

[24] Trial by Ordeal was run by the clergy, it involved the accused holding a hot iron, the hands immedietly after wrapped in oil bandage and after three days the bandage removed, if the wound was healing they were inocent, should the wound go sceptic then guilty was the outcome.


 
Expanding the language ties through names :

For the Romanian commune called Bölön in Hungarian, see Belin, Covasna.

In Celtic mythology, Bel, Belenos (also Belenus) was a deity worshipped in Gaul, Cisalpine Gaul, and Celtic areas of Austria, Britain and Spain. He is particularly associated with Cornwall, West Cornwall being anciently called Belerion, the place of Bel. He was the Celtic sun god and had shrines from Aquileia on the Adriatic to Kirkby Lonsdale in England.[1][2]

The etymology of the name is unclear. Suggestions include “shining one,”[3] “the bright one”[4] and “henbane god”.[5]

In the Roman period he was identified with Apollo.[1] There are currently 51 known inscriptions dedicated to Belenus, mainly concentrated in Aquileia and Cisalpine Gaul, but also extend into Gallia Narbonensis, Noricum, and far beyond.[4] Images of Belenus sometimes show him to be accompanied by a female, thought to be the Gaulish deity Belisama.[4]

Epithets

In ancient Gaul and Britain, Apollo may have been equated with fifteen or more different Celtic names and epithets (notably Grannos, Borvo, Maponus, Moritasgus and others).[1] The legendary king Belenus in Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of Britain is probably also derived from this god. The name of the ancient British king Cunobelinus means “hound of Belinos”.

An epithet of Belenus may have been Vindonnus. Apollo Vindonnus had a temple at Essarois near Châtillon-sur-Seine in Burgundy. The sanctuary was based on a curative spring. Part of the temple pediment survives, bearing an inscription to the god and to the spirit of the springs and, above it, the head of a radiate sun-deity. Many votive objects were brought to the shrine, some of oak, and some of stone. Some offerings take the form of images of hands holding fruit or a cake; others represent the parts of the body requiring a cure. In many cases the pilgrims appear to have suffered from eye afflictions.[6]

Teutorix has been suggested as an epithet of Belenus as borrowed into Germanic religion.

Name variants

Belanu, amongst the LiguriansBelanos
Belemnus
Belenos
Belenus
Belinos
Belinu
Belinus
Bellinus
Belus
Belyn in Welsh
Llywelyn, Belenus forms the root for the elyn in this compound Welsh name.

Notes

[1] Nicole Jufer & Thierry Luginbühl (2001). Les dieux gaulois : répertoire des noms de divinités celtiques connus par l’épigraphie, les textes antiques et la toponymie. Paris: Editions Errance. ISBN 2-87772-200-7.


[3] Mythology – General Editor C. Scott ISBN 978-1-84483-061-9

[4] Koch, John T. (2006). Celtic Culture: A Historical Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, Inc. ISBN 1-85109-440-7.

[5] Peter Schrijver, “On Henbane and Early European Narcotics”, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie vol.51 (1999), pp.17-45

[6] Dictionary of Celtic Myth and Legend. Miranda Green. Thames and Hudson Ltd. London. 1997

Ancient deities of Gaul, Britain and Gallaecia by region.
Supra-regional

Alaunus, Alisanos, Andarta, Anextiomarus, Artio, Aveta, Belenus, Belisama, Borvo, Brigantia, Camulus, Cernunnos, Cicolluis, Cissonius, Condatis, Damona, Matrona, Dis Pater, Epona, Erecura, Esus, Genii Cucullati, Grannus, Ialonus Contrebis, Lenus, Litavis, Loucetios, Lugus, Maponos, Matres, Mogons, Nantosuelta, Ogmios, Rosmerta, Segomo, Sirona, Sucellus, Suleviae, Taranis, Toutatis, Virotutis, Visucius

Britannia

Abandinus, Alaisiagae, Ancasta, Andraste, Belatu-Cadros, Britannia, Cocidius, Coventina, Iouga, Latis, Nodens, Ricagambeda, Satiada, Senua, Sulis, Verbeia, Veteris

Gallia Aquitania

Abellio, Fagus

Gallia Belgica

Abnoba, Ancamna, Arduinna, Arvernus, Icovellauna, Inciona, Intarabus, Iovantucarus, Ritona, Veraudunus, Vindonnus, Vosegus, Xulsigiae

Gallia Celtica

Anvallus, Atepomarus, Bricta, Icaunis, Luxovius, Nemetona, Moritasgus, Mullo, Naria, Robor, Sequana, Souconna, Smertrios, Telo

Gallia Cisalpina

Ambisagrus

Gallia Narbonensis

Artaius, Buxenus, Catubodua, Lero et Lerina, Nemausus, Rudianos

Germania Inferior

Aufaniae, Gebrinius, Nehalennia

Gallaecia

Bandua, Endovelicus, Nabia, Reue

Further Study





juancas

AUDIOS IVOOX.COM y EMBEDR PLAYLIST



IVOOX.COM


PRINCIPALES de ivoox.com

    BIBLIA - LINKS en ivoox.com

  1. BIBLIA I - LINKS en ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012
  2. BIBLIA II - LINKS en ivoox.com - sábado, 29 de diciembre de 2012
  3. BIOGRAFÍAS - LINKS - ivoox.com

  4. BIOGRAFÍAS - LINKS - ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012
  5. EGIPTO - LINKS - ivoox.com

  6. EGIPTO - LINKS - ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012
  7. Deepak Chopra - Eckchart Tolle - LINKS - ivoox.com

  8. Deepak Chopra - Eckchart Tolle - LINKS - ivoox.com - martes, 28 de agosto de 2012
  9. HISTORIA en GENERAL - LINKS

  10. HISTORIA en GENERAL - LINKS - jueves, 4 de octubre de 2012

PLAYLIST - EMBEDR


  1. JESUCRITO I - viernes 13 de enero de 2012
  2. Mundo Religioso 1 - miércoles 28 de diciembre de 2011
  3. Mundo Religioso 2 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  4. Mitología Universal 1 (Asturiana) - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  5. El Narrador de Cuentos - UNO - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  6. El Narrador de Cuentos - DOS - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011

MEDICINA NATURAL, RELAJACION

  1. Medicina Natural - Las Plantas Medicinales 1 (Teoría) - miércoles 28 de diciembre de 2011
  2. Medicina Natural - Plantas Medicinales 1 y 2 (Visión de las Plantas) - miércoles 28 de diciembre de 2011
  3. Practica de MEDITATION & RELAXATION 1 - viernes 6 de enero de 2012
  4. Practica de MEDITATION & RELAXATION 2 - sábado 7 de enero de 2012

VAISHNAVAS, HINDUISMO

  1. KRSNA - RAMA - VISHNU -  jueves 16 de febrero de 2012
  2. Gopal Krishna Movies -  jueves 16 de febrero de 2012
  3. Yamuna Devi Dasi -  jueves 16 de febrero de 2012
  4. SRILA PRABHUPADA I -  miércoles 15 de febrero de 2012
  5. SRILA PRABHUPADA II -  miércoles 15 de febrero de 2012
  6. KUMBHA MELA -  miércoles 15 de febrero de 2012
  7. AVANTIKA DEVI DASI - NÉCTAR BHAJANS -  miércoles 15 de febrero de 2012
  8. GANGA DEVI MATA -  miércoles 15 de febrero de 2012
  9. SLOKAS y MANTRAS I - lunes 13 de febrero de 2012
  10. GAYATRI & SHANTI MANTRAS - martes 14 de febrero de 2012
  11. Lugares Sagrados de la India 1 - miércoles 28 de diciembre de 2011
  12. Devoción - PLAYLIST - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  13. La Sabiduria de los Maestros 1 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  14. La Sabiduria de los Maestros 2 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  15. La Sabiduria de los Maestros 3 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  16. La Sabiduria de los Maestros 4 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  17. La Sabiduría de los Maestros 5 - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011
  18. Universalidad 1 - miércoles 4 de enero de 2012

Biografías

  1. Biografía de los Clasicos Antiguos Latinos 1 - viernes 30 de diciembre de 2011
  2. Swami Premananda - PLAYLIST - jueves 29 de diciembre de 2011

Romanos

  1. Emperadores Romanos I - domingo 1 de enero de 2012

Egipto

  1. Ajenaton, momias doradas, Hatshepsut, Cleopatra - sábado 31 de diciembre de 2011
  2. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO I - jueves 12 de enero de 2012
  3. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO II - sábado 14 de enero de 2012
  4. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO III - lunes 16 de enero de 2012
  5. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO IV - martes 17 de enero de 2012
  6. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO V - miércoles 18 de enero de 2012
  7. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO VI - sábado 21 de enero de 2012
  8. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO VII - martes 24 de enero de 2012
  9. EL MARAVILLOSO EGIPTO VIII - viernes 27 de enero de 2012

La Bíblia

  1. El Mundo Bíblico 1 - lunes 2 de enero de 2012 (de danizia)
  2. El Mundo Bíblico 2 - martes 3 de enero de 2012 (de danizia)
  3. El Mundo Bíblico 3 - sábado 14 de enero de 2012
  4. El Mundo Bíblico 4 - sábado 14 de enero de 2012
  5. El Mundo Bíblico 5 - martes 21 de febrero de 2012
  6. El Mundo Bíblico 6 - miércoles 22 de febrero de 2012
  1. La Bíblia I - lunes 20 de febrero de 2012
  2. La Bíblia II - martes 10 de enero de 2012
  3. La Biblia III - martes 10 de enero de 2012
  4. La Biblia IV - miércoles 11 de enero de 2012
  5. La Biblia V - sábado 31 de diciembre de 2011








TABLA - FUENTES - FONTS

SOUV2 BalaramScaGoudyFOLIO 4.2Biblica Font





free counters

Disculpen las Molestias

Planet ISKCON - 2010  ·  Planet ISKCON - 2011

Maestros Espirituales

IVOOX.COM

PRINCIPALES

BIBLIA - LINKS en ivoox.com

  • BIBLIA I - LINKS en ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012
  • BIBLIA II - LINKS en ivoox.com - sábado, 29 de diciembre de 2012
  • VIDA de los SANTOS - LINKS en ivoox.com

    VIDA de los SANTOS - LINKS en ivoox.com - domingo, 28 de octubre de 2012

    BIOGRAFÍAS - LINKS - ivoox.com

    BIOGRAFÍAS - LINKS - ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012

    EGIPTO - LINKS - ivoox.com

    EGIPTO - LINKS - ivoox.com - domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012

    Deepak Chopra - Eckchart Tolle - LINKS - ivoox.com

    Deepak Chopra - Eckchart Tolle - LINKS - ivoox.com - martes, 28 de agosto de 2012

    HISTORIA en GENERAL - LINKS

    HISTORIA en GENERAL - LINKS - jueves, 4 de octubre de 2012

    ARCHIVOS AKASHICOS

    Archivos Akashicos - LINKS - sábado, 29 de diciembre de 2012

    Documentales Sonoros (misteriosemanal.com)

    Documentales Sonoros (www.misteriosemanal.com) - LINKS - sábado, 5 de enero de 2013

    OTRAS - LINKS - ivoox.com

    AUDIO en ivoox.com - LINKS

    1 comentario: